The Role of Fixed-Dome and Floating Drum Biogas Digester for Energy Security in Indonesia
Abstract
Since 2010, technological innovations for small-medium biogas digester in Indonesia were mainly dominated by two designs; 1. fixed-dome digesters as a strong technology and proven in other developing countries, 2. the floating drum digester made of fiberglass as a suitable design for Indonesia’s earthquake-prone geography. This study analyzes the effectiveness of these two-biogas technologies for energy security in the country, from the perspectives of stakeholders of biogas programs. The study draws on semi-structured interviews, reviews of policy and program reports and documentation, as well as academic literature. Data were collected from key institutions and other stakeholders related to biogas programs, e.g. ministries, local governments, businesses, civil society, and academics. These institutions provided their review on the effectiveness of fixeddome and floating drum biogas digester. This study found that the technological effectiveness and reliability of both biogas technological design are relatively the same. Both technological designs are found to have problems a few weeks after the installation in some regions. These issues were caused by a lack of enforcement to the standard of technological construction. In terms of contribution to energy security, both designs contribute to the sustainability, availability, and affordability aspects of the energy system in the country. The diversity of technological design supports the resilience of the energy system. As a way forward, more detailed monitoring and evaluation are required to check damaged biodigesters and maintain a good quality of construction of both designs, particularly in rural areas.
Downloads
References
Alam, M. (2013). Bringing the blue flame home: Investigating successful implementation of household biogas program (‘BIRU’) in Bantul Regency, Yogyakarta Province from the view of co-evolutionary framework. Seminar Nasional Manajemen Teknologi XVIII, Surabaya.
Anugrah, I. S., Sarwoprasodjo, S., Suradisastra, K., & Purnaningsih, N. (2014). Sistem pertanian terintegrasi – Simantri: Konsep, pelaksanaan, dan perannya dalam pembangunan pertanian di Provinsi Bali. Forum penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 32(2), 157–176. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v32n2.2014.157-176
Bedi, A., Benscha, G., Niemanna, R., Peters, J., Sparrow, R., & Tasciotti, L. (2012). Impact evaluation of the Indonesia domestic biogas programme. Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut Für Wirtschaftsforschung, Essen, German and International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bedi, A., Sparrow, R., & Tasciotti, L. (2017). The impact of a household biogas programme on energy use and expenditure in East Java. Energy Economics, 68, 66–76.
BIRU. (2019). Reaktor biogas – biogas rumah. Retrieved from: http://www.biru.or.id/reaktor-biogas
Bond, T., & Templeton, M. R. (2011). History and future of domestic biogas plants in the developing world. Energy for Sustainable Development, 15(4), 347–354.
Bostan, I., Gheorghe, A. V., Dulgheru, V., Sobor, I., Bostan, V., & Sochirean, A. (2012). Resilient energy systems: Renewables: Wind, solar, hydro. Springer Science & Business Media.
BPS. (2017). Persentase-rumah-tangga-menurut-provinsi-dan-bahan-bakar-utama-untuk-memasak-tahun-2001-2007-2016. Retrieved from: https://www.bps.go.id/statictable/2014/09/10/1364/persentase-rumah-tangga-menurut-provinsi-dan-bahan-bakar-utama-untuk-memasak-tahun-2001-2007-2016.html.
Budiman, I. (2018). Enabling community participation for social innovation in the energy sector. Indonesian Journal of Energy, 1(2), 21–31–21–31.
Budiman, I., Muthahhari, R., Kaynak, C., Reichwein, F., & Zhang, W. (2018). Multiple challenges and opportunities for biogas dissemination in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Energy, 1(2), 46–60–46–60.
Budiman, I., & Smits, M. (2020). How do configuration shifts in fragmented energy governance affect policy output? A case study of changing biogas regimes in Indonesia. Sustainability, 12(4), 1358. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041358
Budiman, I., & Smits, M. M. (2018). The tangled thread: Fragmentation of biogas governance in Indonesia.
Cheng, S., Li, Z., Mang, H.-P., Huba, E.-M., Gao, R., & Wang, X. (2014). Development and application of prefabricated biogas digesters in developing countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 387–400.
DEN. (2016). Indonesia energy outlook 2016. Sekretariat Jenderal Dewan Energi Nasional.
Goldthau, A. (2014). Rethinking the governance of energy infrastructure: Scale, decentralization and polycentrism. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 134–140.
IESR. (2020). Energi untuk memasak selama #dirumahaja: Tetap nyaman dengan energi bersih terbarukan. IESR. Retrieved from: http://iesr.or.id/energi-untuk-memasak-selama-dirumahaja-dirumahajaaman-memasak-tetap-nyaman-dengan-energi-bersih-terbarukan/
IRENA. (2016). Measuring small-scale biogas capacity and production. 36.
Ismail, C. J., Takama, T., Budiman, I., & Knight, M. (2019). Comparative study on agriculture and forestry climate change adaptation projects in Mongolia, the Philippines, and Timor Leste. In P. Castro, A. M. Azul, W. Leal Filho, & U. M. Azeiteiro (Eds.), Climate Change-Resilient Agriculture and Agroforestry: Ecosystem Services and Sustainability (pp. 413–430). Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75004-0_24
MEMR. (2018). Realisasi program biogas. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Indonesia.
Osak, R., Hartono, B., Fanani, Z., & Utami, H. D. (2015). Biogas and bioslurry utilization on dairy-horticulture integrated farming system in Tutur Nongkojajar, District of Pasuruan, East Java, Indonesia. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 27(4), 65.
PYC. (2019). PYC field study: Biogas reactor at PT Swen Inovasi transfer in Ciomas, Bogor. The Purnomo Yusgiantoro Center. Retrieved from: https://www.purnomoyusgiantorocenter.org/2019/05/15/pyc-field-trip-report-biogas-reactor-at-pt-swen-inovasi-transfer-in-ciomas-bogor/
Rupf, G. V., Bahri, P. A., de Boer, K., & McHenry, M. P. (2015). Barriers and opportunities of biogas dissemination in Sub-Saharan Africa and lessons learned from Rwanda, Tanzania, China, India, and Nepal. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 468–476.
Sathish, S., & Vivekanandan, S. (2016). Parametric optimization for floating drum anaerobic bio-digester using response surface methodology and artificial neural network. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55(4), 3297–3307.
Sovacool, B. K. (2011). Evaluating energy security in the Asia Pacific: Towards a more comprehensive approach. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7472–7479. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.008
Thoday, K., Benjamin, P., Gan, M., & Puzzolo, E. (2018). The mega conversion program from kerosene to LPG in Indonesia: Lessons learned and recommendations for future clean cooking energy expansion. Energy for Sustainable Development, 46, 71–81. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2018.05.011
Transrisk. (2017). Report on social discourse analyses and social network analyses. Retrieved from: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/public-energy/documents/transrisk-report-report-social-discourse-analyses-and-social-network-analyses
Verbong, G., & Loorbach, D. (2012). Governing the energy transition: Reality, illusion or necessity?. Routledge.
Yadhunath, K. K. (2013). Move off the grid. Partridge Publishing.
