Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and Its Implications for Developing Economies: A Systematic Literature Review

Danial Muhammad Wirdyansyah

Authors

Danial Muhammad Wirdyansyah Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Keywords:

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), carbon leakage, climate policy, developing economies, trade equity

Abstract

Despite growing interest in the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), there remains a significant research gap in reviewing its nuanced impacts on the least developed economies—particularly in terms of sectoral vulnerabilities, institutional constraints, and the absence of empirical evidence from real-world implementation. Thus, we systematically investigate the CBAM implications for developing countries through a structured literature review. We offer a novel contribution by examining CBAM’s overlooked impacts on the smallest and least developed economies, highlighting distributional effects on labor-intensive sectors and small exporters. Starting with an initial pool of 1,197 articles sourced via Publish or Perish, we apply the PRISMA and PICO frameworks to screen and refine the selection, ultimately analyzing 37 peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 and 2024 in Q1–Q3 Scopus-indexed journals. Our review identifies five major thematic concerns: trade competitiveness, industrial vulnerability, green technology access, climate justice, and policy responses. It finds that CBAM poses significant economic risks for carbon-intensive exports from the Global South, particularly in sectors such as iron, fertilizer, cement, and aluminum. Countries like Indonesia, India, China, and Vietnam face varying degrees of exposure depending on emission intensity and trade composition. We highlight the absence of embedded climate justice mechanisms and structural barriers to green technology access, which may hinder just net-zero transitions. In response, scholars recommend policy mechanisms such as revenue redistribution, differentiated carbon accounting, and international capacity-building. We conclude by contrasting CBAM with protectionist measures such as those enacted during the Trump administration, emphasizing CBAM’s environmental rationale while calling for adaptive, equitable strategies that align global climate goals with sustainable development in vulnerable economies. Our study advances academic discourse by elucidating the varied ways in which CBAM is conceptualized and debated across different scholarly perspectives. It also offers practical recommendations for policymakers—including financial assistance, technology transfer, and institutional capacity building—to better align climate ambition with the principles of development equity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acar, S., A??c?, A. A., & Yeldan, A. E. (2022). Potential effects of the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism on the Turkish economy. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(6), 8162–8194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01779-1

Adkins, L., Garbaccio, R., Ho, M., Moore, E., & Morgenstern, R. (2011). Trade effects and emissions leakage associated with carbon pricing policies.

Alfvegren, G. (2025). The EU’s CBAM in a turbulent global context-a new horizon for the green transition or the beginning of a new trade war? Lund University.

Bashmakov, I. A. (2022). CBAM and Russian export. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 1, 34-52.

Beaufils, T., Ward, H., Jakob, M., & Wenz, L. (2023). Assessing different European carbon border adjustment mechanism implementations and their impact on trade partners. Communications Earth & Environment, 4(1), 131.

Casey, B. J., Gray, W. B., Linn, J., & Morgenstern, R. (2020). How does state-level carbon pricing in the United States affect industrial competitiveness? National Bureau Of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w26629

Chen, Z. (2024). The impact of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism on China’s exports and suggestions on countermeasures. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 64, 56–63.

Chepeliev, M. (2021). Possible implications of the European carbon border adjustment mechanism for Ukraine and other EU trading partners. Energy Research Letters, 2(1).

Chu, H. L., Do, N. T., Nguyen, L., Le, L., Ho, Q. A., Dang, K., & Ta, M. A. (2024). The economic impacts of the European Union’s carbon border adjustment mechanism on developing countries: the case of Vietnam. Fulbright Review of Economics and Policy, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/frep-03-2024-0011

Clausing, K. A., & Wolfram, C. (2023). Carbon border adjustments, climate clubs, and subsidy races when climate policies vary. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37(3), 137–162.

Demirdelen, T., Aksu, ?. Ö., Yilmaz, K., Koç, D. D., Arikan, M., & ?ener, A. (2023). Investigation of the carbon footprint of the textile industry: PES- and PP-based products with Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis. In Sustainability, 15(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914237

Do, T. N. (2025). Reimagining carbon border adjustment mechanisms: A path to climate and development synergy. Global Transitions, 7, 144–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2025.03.003

Durán, G. M. (2023). Securing compatibility of carbon border adjustments with the multilateral climate and trade regimes. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 72(1), 73–103. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589322000501

Ernst, A., Hinterlang, N., Mahle, A., & Stähler, N. (2022). Carbon pricing, border adjustment and climate clubs: An assessment with EMuSe (Issue 25/2022). Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper.

European Council, C. of E. U. (2022, December 13). EU climate action: Provisional agreement reached on Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). https://Www.Consilium.Europa.Eu/En/Press/Press-Releases/2022/12/13/Eu-Climate-Action-Provisional-Agreement-Reached-on-Carbon-Border-Adjustment-Mechanism-Cbam/

Faichuk, O., Voliak, L., Hutsol, T., Glowacki, S., Pantsyr, Y., & others. (2022). European green deal: threats assessment for agri-food exporting countries to the EU. Sustainability, 14(7), 3712. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3712

Gerbeti, A. (2021). Market mechanisms for reducing emissions and the introduction of a flexible consumption tax. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(Suppl 2), 161–178.

Grácová, K. (2024). Union carbon border adjustment mechanism. Central European University.

Gunnell, K. E., Belcourt, V. J., Tomasone, J. R., & Weeks, L. C. (2022). Systematic review methods. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(1), 5–29.

Hancock, L., & Wollersheim, L. (2021). EU carbon diplomacy: assessing hydrogen security and policy impact in Australia and Germany. Energies, 14(23), 8103. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14238103

Hsieh, Y. L., & Yeh, S. C. (2024). The trends of major issues connecting climate change and the sustainable development goals. Discover Sustainability, 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00183-9

Huang, T., Liu, Z., & Zhao, T. (2022). Evolutionary game analysis of responding to the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism. Energies, 15(2), 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020427

IEA. (2025). Energy sector carbon emissions reached a new record in 2024. International Energy Agency (IEA). https://www.Iea.Org/Reports/Global-Energy-Review-2025/Co2-Emissions

Jakob, M. (2023). The political economy of carbon border adjustment in the EU. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 39(1), 134–146.

Kondo, R., Kinoshita, Y., & Yamada, T. (2019). Green procurement decisions with carbon leakage by global suppliers and order quantities under different carbon tax. Sustainability 11(13), 3710. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133710

Korpar, N., Larch, M., & Stöllinger, R. (2023). The European carbon border adjustment mechanism: a small step in the right direction. International Economics and Economic Policy, 20(1), 95–138.

Korppoo, A. (2022). Russian discourses on benefits and threats from international climate diplomacy. Climatic Change. 170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03299-3

KPMG. (2022). EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). https://kpmg.Com/Xx/En/Our-Insights/Esg/Carbon-Border-Adjustment-Mechanism-Cbam.Html.

Kuehner, A. K. (2022). German stakeholder perceptions of an EU carbon border adjustment mechanism. Environmental Research Letters, 17(12). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac9f23

Lin, B. Q., & Zhao, H. S. (2023). Which sectors should be covered by the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism? In Advances in Climate Change Research. 14(5). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674927823001491

Liu, Z., Deng, Z., Davis, S., & Ciais, P. (2023). Monitoring global carbon emissions in 2022. In Nature Reviews Earth and Environment, 4(4), 205–206. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00406-z

Magacho, G., Etienne, E., & and Godin, A. (2024). Impacts of the CBAM on EU trade partners: consequences for developing countries. Climate Policy, 24(2), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2200758

Mehling, M. A., & Ritz, R. A. (2023). From theory to practice: determining emissions in traded goods under a border carbon adjustment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 39(1), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grac043

Mehling, M., van Asselt, H., Droege, S., & Das, K. (2022). The form and substance of international cooperation on border carbon adjustments.

Nowell, L., Paolucci, A., Dhingra, S., Jacobsen, M., Lorenzetti, D. L., Lorenzetti, L., & Oddone-Paolucci, E. (2022). Interdisciplinary mixed methods systematic reviews: Reflections on methodological best practices, theoretical considerations, and practical implications across disciplines. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 100295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100295

Perdana, S., & Vielle, M. (2022). Making the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism acceptable and climate friendly for least developed countries. Energy Policy, 170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113245

Perdana, S., & Vielle, M. (2023). Carbon border adjustment mechanism in the transition to net-zero emissions: Collective implementation and distributional impacts. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 25(3), 299–329.

Pirlot, A. (2022). Carbon border adjustment measures: a straightforward multi-purpose climate change instrument? Journal of Environmental Law, 34(1), 25-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqab028

Prentice, J. (2013). Carbon leakage and competitiveness under the EU ETS. European Energy and Environment Law Review. http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/index_

Rahmah, R., & Maulayati, R. R. (2023). Sukuk trend analysis: Bibliometric and systematic literature review from 2011 – 2021. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah: Teori dan Terapan, 10(4), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.20473/vol10iss20234pp377-390

Schippers, M. L., & De Wit, W. (2022). Proposal for a carbon border adjustment mechanism. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 17(1).

Selicato, G. (2022). The EU proposal for a carbon border adjustment mechanism: An advanced tool to combat’carbon leakage’, a new EU own resource of’moral suasion’for third countries? Review of European and Comparative Law, 50(1), 25.

Shen, H., Yang, Q., Luo, L., & Huang, N. (2023). Market reactions to a cross-border carbon policy: Evidence from listed Chinese companies. The British Accounting Review, 55(1), 101116.

Smith, I. D., Overland, I., & Szulecki, K. (2024). The EU’s CBAM and its “significant others”: Three perspectives on the political fallout from Europe’s unilateral climate policy initiative. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13512

Sofuo?lu, E., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2023). Towards achieving net zero emission targets and sustainable development goals: Can long-term material footprint strategies be a useful tool? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(10), 26636–26649.

Song, Y. (2024). Analysis of the potential impact of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism on China. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 39, 64–70.

Stranadko, N. (2022). Global climate governance: rising trend of translateral cooperation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 22(4), 639–657.

Sun, X., Mi, Z., Cheng, L., Coffman, D. M., & Liu, Y. (2024). The carbon border adjustment mechanism is inefficient in addressing carbon leakage and results in unfair welfare losses. Fundamental Research, 4(3), 660-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2023.02.026

Ulanov, V. L., & Skorobogatko, O. N. (2022). Impact of EU carbon border adjustment mechanism on the economic efficiency of Russian oil refining. ??????? ??????? ?????????, 257, 865–876.

van de Ven, D. J., Mittal, S., Gambhir, A., Lamboll, R. D., Doukas, H., Giarola, S., Hawkes, A., Koasidis, K., Köberle, A. C., McJeon, H., Perdana, S., Peters, G. P., Rogelj, J., Sognnaes, I., Vielle, M., & Nikas, A. (2023). A multimodel analysis of post-Glasgow climate targets and feasibility challenges. Nature Climate Change, 13(6), 570–578. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01661-0

Welfens, P. J. J. (2020). Trump’s trade policy, BREXIT, corona dynamics, EU crisis and declining multilateralism. International Economics and Economic Policy, 17(3), 563–634.

Zhao, L. T., Chen, Z. Y., Duan, Y. X., & Qiu, R. X. (2024). How will CBAM affect the decarbonisation of steel industry in China? A system dynamics approach. International Journal of Production Research, 62(18). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2285397

Zhong, J. (2024). Carbon border adjustment mechanism: a systematic literature review of the latest developments. Climate Policy, 24(2), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2190074

Zhu, J., Zhao, Y., & Zheng, L. (2024). The impact of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism on China’s exports to the EU. Energies. 17(2), 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17020509