Enabling Community Participation for Social Innovation in the Energy Sector

  • Ibnu Budiman Wageningen University
Keywords: Enabling condition, social innovation, renewable energy, citizen initiatives, community participation


This study investigates enabling conditions for facilitating social innovation in the energy sector. This aspect is important to support the energy transition in Indonesia. This research provides appropriate project direction, including research (and action) gaps for the energy actors in Indonesia. The actors are encouraged to work further with the result of this study to stimulate the energy transition in Indonesia. This study uses a systemic change framework which recognizes four drivers of systemic change in a region: 1. transforming political ecologies; 2. configuring green economies; 3. building adaptive communities; 4. social innovation. These drivers are interconnected, and this study focuses on how the social innovation can be supported by other drivers. This study used interviews and literature review as the sources of data. There were interviews with eight experts who come from different countries and are experienced in social innovation in the energy sector. Afterward, this research reviewed related journal papers from the last five years, to check the latest developments within the topic, to support the interview results. The study found that the enabling condition can focus on one of the drivers of systemic change, which is building communities by increasing their participation, through several integrated actions. This point can be implemented in two types of citizen energy initiatives which are energy cooperatives and sustainable consumption initiatives. Further implementation of these initiatives requires a study on policy and governance support, to create complete enabling conditions to facilitate social innovation in the energy transition.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ibnu Budiman, Wageningen University

Wageningen University, Netherlands


Akella, A. K., Saini, R. P., & Sharma, M. P. (2009). Social, economic and environmental impacts of renewable energy systems. Renewable Energy, 34(2), 390-396.

Arent, D., Arndt, C., Miller, M., Zinaman, O., & Tarp, F. (Eds). (2017). The Political Economy of Clean Energy Transitions. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Bauwens, T., Gotchev, B., & Holstenkamp, L. (2016). What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives. Energy Research & Social Science, 13, 136-147.

Brand, K. W. (2008). Konsum im Kontext. Der „verantwortliche Konsument “–ein Motor nachhaltigen Konsums. Nachhaltigkeit als radikaler Wandel. Die Quadratur des Kreises, 71-93.

Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. M. (2013). Revisiting the urban politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 136-154.

Chermack, T. J., & Kasshanna, B. K. (2007). The use and misuse of SWOT analysis and implications for HRD professionals. Human Resource Development International, 10(4), 383-399.

Claudy, M. C., Peterson, M., & O’Driscoll, A. (2013). Understanding the attitude-behavior gap for renewable energy systems using behavioral reasoning theory. Journal of Macromarketing, 33(4), 273-287.

Coutard, O., & Rutherford, J. (2010). Energy transition and city–region planning: understanding the spatial politics of systemic change. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(6), 711-727.

Davidsson, S. (2014). Global Energy Transitions: A Comparative Analysis of Key Countries and Implications for the International Energy Debate. World Energy Council, Weltnerergierat: Berlin, Germany.

Dyson, R. G. (2004). Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of Warwick. European journal of operational research, 152(3), 631-640.

European Commission services. (2017). Horizon 2020 - Secure, clean and efficient energy (Version 19 May 2017).

European Commission. (2016). Clean Energy For All Europeans (COM(2016) 860 final). Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:fa6ea15b-b7b0-11e6-9e3c-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF

European Commission. (n.d.). Secure, Clean and Efficient Energy - European Commission. Retrieved October 16, 2017, from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/secure-clean-and-efficient-energy

Hand, E. (2010). People power. Nature, 466(7307), 685.

Hazel, K. L., & Onaga, E. (2003). Experimental social innovation and dissemination: The promise and its delivery. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32(3-4), 285-294.

Heaslip, E., Costello, G. J., & Lohan, J. (2016). Assessing good-practice frameworks for the development of sustainable energy communities in Europe: lessons from Denmark and Ireland. Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, 4(3), 307-319.

Hielscher, S., Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2011). Community innovation for sustainable energy (No. 2011-03). CSERGE Working Paper.

Hisschemöller, M., & Sioziou, I. (2013). Boundary organizations for resource mobilization: enhancing citizens’ involvement in the Dutch energy transition. Environmental Politics, 22(5), 792-810.

Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical assessment, research & evaluation, 12(10), 1-8.

Huybrechts, B., & Mertens, S. (2014). The relevance of the cooperative model in the field of renewable energy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 85(2), 193-212.

Islar, M., & Busch, H. (2016). “We are not in this to save the polar bears!”–the link between community renewable energy development and ecological citizenship. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29(3), 303-319.

Kollmuss, A., Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260.

Kumar, R. (2014). Research Methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. London: Sage Publications.

Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications (Vol. 29). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Loorbach, D., Van der Brugge, R., & Taanman, M. (2008). Governance in the energy transition: Practice of transition management in the Netherlands. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 9(2-3), 294-315.

Mees, H. L. P., Dijk, J., Van Soest, D., Driessen, P. P. J., Van Rijswick, M. H. F. M. W., & Runhaar, H. (2014). A method for the deliberate and deliberative selection of policy instrument mixes for climate change adaptation. Ecology and Society, 19(2).

Miller, C., Richter, J., O’Leary, J. (2015). Socio-energy systems design: A policy framework for energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science. 6, 29-40.

Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture, and Innovation. (2010, November 4). CO2-opslagproject Barendrecht van de baan | Nieuwsbericht | Rijksoverheid.nl. Retrieved October 11, 2017, from https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/actueel/nieuws/2010/11/04/co2-opslagproject-barendrecht-van-de-baan

Morris, C. (2017, January 30). Clean energy or renewable energy? The label matters! - Energy transition. Retrieved October 10, 2017, from https://energytransition.org/2017/01/clean-energy-or-renewable-energy-the-label-matters/

Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. London: National endowment for science, technology and the art.

Nicholls, A., & Murdock, A. (2012). The nature of social innovation. In Social innovation (pp. 1-30). Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Oberthür, S., & Roche Kelly, C. (2008). EU leadership in international climate policy: achievements and challenges. The International Spectator, 43(3), 35-50.

Oteman, M., Kooij, H. J., & Wiering, M. A. (2017). Pioneering renewable energy in an economic energy policy system: the history and development of Dutch grassroots initiatives. Sustainability, 9(4), 550.

Pacheco-Torgal, F. (2014). Eco-efficient construction and building materials research under the EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020. Construction and building materials, 51, 151-162.

Pol, E., & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term?. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 878-885.

Rathnayaka, A. D., Potdar, V. M., Hussain, O., & Dillon, T. (2011, December). Identifying prosumer's energy sharing behaviours for forming optimal prosumer-communities. In Cloud and Service Computing (CSC), 2011 International Conference on (pp. 199-206). IEEE.

Rutherford, J., & Coutard, O. (2014). Urban Energy Transitions: Places, Processes and Politics of Socio-technical Change. Urban Studies, 51(7), 1353-1377.

Solomon, B. D., & Krishna, K. (2011). The coming sustainable energy transition: History, strategies, and outlook. Energy Policy, 39(11), 7422-7431.

TRANSrisk. (2017). Report on Social Discourse Analyses and Social Network Analyses Retrieved from https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/public-energy/documents/transrisk-report-report-social-discourse-analyses-and-social-network-analyses

United Nations. (2015). Sustainable development goals – United Nations. Retrieved September 27, 2017, from http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/

Van Der Schoor, T., & Scholtens, B. (2015). Power to the people: Local community initiatives and the transition to sustainable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 666-675.

Weber, T. (2016, December 9). Sauber argumentiert - Energiewende - Erneuerbare Energien. Retrieved October 10, 2017, from https://www.erneuerbareenergien.de/sauber-argumentiert/150/437/99569

Wolfram, M., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2016). Cities and systemic change for sustainability: Prevailing epistemologies and an emerging research agenda. Sustainability, 8(2), 144.

Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy policy, 35(5), 2683-2691.

How to Cite
Budiman, I. (2018). Enabling Community Participation for Social Innovation in the Energy Sector. Indonesian Journal of Energy, 1(2), 21 -. https://doi.org/10.33116/ije.v1i2.23